308 Insurance Ch. 106
specifying that autism is not a mental illness and must be treated as and covered
under a health benefit plan like a medical condition. With the development of
mental health parity laws, ASD is now covered by the mental health parity laws, yet
the state law excluding autism from the definition of a mental illness was never
repealed and has resulted in confusion among carriers and consumers as to whether
mental health parity applies to ASD.
(e) In 2009, after the passage of the federal "Mental Health Parity and Addiction
Equity Act of 2008" (MHPAEA), Colorado enacted Senate Bill 09-244, which
requires health benefit plans to provide coverage for the assessment, diagnosis, and
treatment of ASD and establishes annual dollar limits on the amount of coverage a
health benefit plan must provide to a child eligible for the coverage;
(f) With the passage of the federal "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"
and the "Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010" (together referred
to as the ACA), the ASD coverage required under state law is now considered part
of the essential health benefits that all health plans subject to the ACA must provide
without annual limits on the dollar value of the ASD benefits;
(g) To align with the ACA, the general assembly enacted House Bill 13-1266
which, among other items, replaced the dollar limits specified in state law for ASD
benefits with actuarial equivalents, as determined by the commissioner of insurance,
which contradicts the MHPAEA and the state mental health parity law because such
limits on ASD benefits cannot be imposed unless similar limits apply to services for
a physical illness;
(h) Thus, it is important to clarify that:
(I) ASD is a mental disorder for purposes of state and federal mental health parity
laws, and therefore, the benefits for ASD must be no less extensive than the
coverage provided for a physical illness;
(II) Coverage under a health benefit plan for ASD benefits cannot contain any
limits on the number of services or visits; and
(III) Providing benefits for ASD that are substantially equivalent to benefits for
a physical illness does not constitute an addition to the state's essential health
benefits required under the ACA.
(2) Furthermore, the general assembly acknowledges the added expense and
difficulty imposed on carriers and state regulators by requiring carriers to adjust
health benefit plans they will be issuing, delivering, or renewing for the 2016 plan
year and has therefore determined that this act should apply to plans issued,
delivered, or renewed on or after January 1, 2017. However, the general assembly
recognizes the vital necessity of ensuring access to and full coverage for the range
of treatments needed for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and
therefore encourages carriers to provide the coverage required by this act as soon
as possible.
SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-104, amend (1.4) (a) (II)
introductory portion, (1.4) (a) (II) (E), (1.4) (a) (III), (1.4) (a) (XII) introductory