The Biochemistry and Cell Signaling Pathway of MC1R
www.BioInteractive.org Page 5 of 5
The Making of the Fittest:
Natural Selection and Adaptation
5. The wild-type (normal) Mc1r gene results in the light coat-color phenotype, while the mutated Mc1r gene results in the dark
coat-color phenotype. Based on your knowledge of the MC1R signaling pathway (Question 3), cell signaling, and the chemistry
of the amino acid changes (Question 4), write a hypothesis for each of the following questions.
a. How could the two extracellular mutations lead to the dark phenotype? (Hint: Think about the chemistry of the amino
acids, particularly their charge.)
The extracellular mutations at positions 018 and 109 both change a positively charged arginine amino acid to
electrical charge in the extracellular domains of the receptor protein could increase the affinity of the ligand
for the receptor, therefore amplifying the pathway signal and thus producing more eumelanin. The change in
charge could also decrease the ef
fect of an antagonist from another gene, which would
also lea
d to the b. How could the two intracellular mutations lead to the dark phenotype? (Hint: Think about the chemistry of the amino
acids, particularly their charge.)
The missense mutation found at position 160 changes a positively charged arginine to a neutral, nonpolar
tryptophan, and the mutation at position 233 replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with a positively
charged and basic histidine. These changes will ultimately change the shape of the intracellular domains of
the protein, perhaps producing an overly active receptor, which would lead to the production of eumelanin.
In addition, this change could increase the activation of the G protein without the need of a ligand. This
increase in activation would amplify the levels of cAMP, thus increasing eumelanin production.
c. How does the wild-type Mc1r gene result in the light phenotype? (Hint: It might be helpful to think of it as not resulting in
the dark phenotype.)
The normal receptor conformation requires a ligand for activation of the G protein. If the ligand is not readily
available, the production of eumelanin will decrease, resulting in a light coat color. Another hypothesis might
be the presence of an antagonist from another gene in the rock pocket mouse that, when expressed,
interferes with the MC1R pathway, thus reducing eumelanin production.
Although we do not expect students to know this, a second gene is known to be involved in the coat color
pathway, namely the agouti gene. This gene produces a protein antagonist to the MC1R pathway. The
presence of this antagonist decreases the production of eumelanin and increases the production of
pheomelanin. Obviously, the mice with light-colored coats contain the normal MC1R receptor and related
pathway,
and they also c
ontain the
agouti gene.
During the hair development cycle, there is a pulse o
f
agouti expression, producing the antagonist that results in the deposition of pheomelanin in the hair. This results in
the light coat-color phenotype. Preliminary results indicate that the mice with the dark Mc1r alleles have
hyper
activ
e M
C1R
receptors that increase the levels of cAMP, thus producing eumelanin in the melanocytes and resulting in the dark phenotype, even though these mice also contain the agouti gene and the protein
antagonist it produces.
AUTHOR
Ann Brokaw, Rocky River High School, Ohio
FIELD TESTERS
Beth Dixon, Western Sierra Collegiate Academy; David Knuffke, Deer Park High School; Chris Monsour, Tiffin Columbian High School