76
prosecution as is imposable in the case of beneficial owner and abettor, benamidars
do not come forward to give evidence against the beneficial owner.
2. Further, many benamidars being of poor means and illiterate, imposing on
them the same penalty as the beneficial owner of such a benami transaction could
be disproportionate in nature. Alternatively, if such benamidars were to become
approvers, it would help in gathering clinching evidence and details about benami
properties and result in convictions of the beneficial owners, thus strengthening the
regime.
3. Furthermore, various other laws of the land provided for a tender of
pardon/immunity from prosecution/ reduced penalty in cases where the witness
assists in the due process of law.
4. It is thus proposed to insert a new section 55A in the PBPT Act, 1988, to
provide that the Initiating Officer may, with a view to obtaining the evidence of the
benamidar or any other person as referred to in section 53, other than the beneficial
owner, tender to such person immunity from penalty for any offence under section
53, with the previous sanction of the competent authority as referred to in section 55,
on condition of his making a full and true disclosure of the whole circumstances
relating to the benami transaction. A tender of immunity made to, and accepted by,
the person concerned, shall, to the extent to which the immunity extends, render him
immune from prosecution for any offence in respect of which the tender was made
and from the imposition of any penalty under section 53 of the Act.
5. Further, it is also proposed to provide that if it appears to the Initiating Officer
that any person to whom immunity has been tendered under this section has not
complied with the condition on which the tender was made or is wilfully concealing
anything or is giving false evidence, the Initiating Officer may record a finding to that
effect, and thereupon, with the previous sanction of the competent authority as
referred to in section 55, the immunity shall be deemed to have been withdrawn, and
any such person may be tried for the offence in respect of which the tender of
immunity was made or for any other offence of which he appears to have been guilty
in connection with the same matter and shall also become liable to the imposition of
any penalty under this Act to which he would have otherwise been liable.
6. This amendment will take effect from the 1st day of October, 2024.
[Clause 154]
In case of divergence of interpretation, the English text shall prevail.