2
governance and lecturer at Diplo, and Ms Barbara
Rosen Jacobson, programme manager at Diplo.
They introduced the main concepts, opportunities,
and challenges that they have been able to distil
from their research. They also added recommen-
dations for eective data diplomacy based on their
summary report of the Data Diplomacy Roundtable,
which was held in April 2017.
Moving further into the practice of data diplomacy,
Mr Graham Nelson, head of the Open Source Unit
of the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Oce (FCO),
provided examples of his unit’s work in analysing
open data to improve foreign policy. This includes
observing social media to measure the impact of
public diplomacy eorts, analysing geospatial data
to identify developments in Daesh-related search
terms in dierent countries. Besides identifying pat-
terns and trends, he also argued that the big data
analysis carried out by his unit is able to corroborate
From his presentation, it was clear that big data
analysis can and does complement traditional data
and qualitative reporting.
consists of a small team of diplomats and data sci-
entists, who have been given space to innovate on
open data. Nelson emphasised that the data analy-
ses need to comply with the ‘proportionality test’:
data collection and analysis need to be necessary,
proportionate, accounted for, and be conducted with
oversight.
Looking at the Finnish perspective and bridging
the gap between statistics and big data, Mr Timo
Koskimäki, deputy director-general of Statistics
Production at Statistics Finland, spoke about Finland
Statistics’ engagement with big data. He explained
that big data might be able to improve the oce’s
analyses, yet the oce is bound by quality criteria
that the data needs to comply with. In addition, there
are challenges to overcome regarding access to big
data, which is often generated by platform econo-
mies and controlled by the private sector. Finland
Statistics is now attempting to start collaborating
with these dataholders, yet, this proves to be a chal-
lenge due to a lack of clarity and regulation about
how these agreements should be framed.
Höne provided a zoomed-out view of data diplomacy,
edge creation in diplomacy. She argued that the big
data trend might yield a new type of knowledge:
those engaging in big data analysis are dealing with
a completely dierent scale of input as the basis for
knowledge; this allows for inaccuracies because of
Image 2: The most relevant use of big data for diplomacy according to the event’s participants