FINANCIAL FACTS ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY
•
Defense costs for death penalty trials
in Kansas averaged about $400,000 per case,
compared to $100,000 per case when the death penalty
was not sought. (Kansas Judicial Council, 2014).
•
A new study in California revealed that the cost of the death penalty in the state has been over $4 billion since 1978. Study considered pre-
trial and trial costs, costs of automatic appeals and state habeas corpus petitions, costs of federal habeas corpus appeals, and costs of
incarcer
ation on death row. (Alarcon & Mitchell, 2011).
•
In Maryland, an average death penalty case resulting in a death sentence costs approximately $3 million. The eventual costs to Maryland
taxpayers for cases pursued 1978-1999 will be $186 million. F
ive executions have resulted. (Urban Institute, 2008).
•
Enforcing the death penalty costs Florida $51 million a year above what it would cost to punish all first-degree murderers with life in prison
without parole.
Based on the 44 executions Florida had carried out since 1976, that amounts to a cost of $24 million for each execution.
(Palm Beach Post, January 4, 2000).
•
The most comprehensive study in the country found that the death penalty costs North Carolina $2.16 million per execution over the costs
of sentencing mur
derers to life imprisonment.
The majority of those costs occur at the trial level. (Duk
e University
,
May 1993).
•
In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the
highest security level for 40 years.
(Dallas Morning News, March 8, 1992).
PUBLIC OPINON AND THE DEATH PENALTY
Support for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
What Interferes with Effective Law Enforcement?
Percent Ranking Item as One of Top Two or Three
Lack of law enforcement resource
Family problems/child abuse
Lack of programs for mentally ill
Insufficient use of the death penalty
• A 2009 poll commissioned by DPIC found police chiefs ranked the death
penalty last among ways to reduce violent crime. The police chiefs also
considered the death penalty the least efficient use of taxpayers’ money.
The Death Penalty Information Center has available more extensive reports on a variety of issues, including:
• “The Death Penalty in 2015: Year-End Report” (December 2015)
• “Battle Scars: Military Veterans and the Death Penalty”
Life without parole plus restitution
39%
• A 2010 poll by Lake Research Partners found that a clear
majority of voters (61%) would choose a punishment other
than the death penalty for murder.
• “The 2% Death Penalty: How a Minority of Counties Produce Most Death Cases at Enormous Costs to All” (October 2013)
• "The Death Penalty in 2013: Year-End Report" (December 2013)
• "Struck By Lightning: The Continuing Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty 35 Years After Its Reinstatement in 1976" (June 2011)
• “Smart on Crime: Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis” (October 2009)
• “A Crisis of Confidence: Americans' Doubts About the Death Penalty” (2007)
• “Blind Justice: Juries Deciding Life and Death with Only Half the Truth” (2005)
• “Innocence and the Crisis in the American Death Penalty” (2004)
• “International Perspectives on the Death Penalty: A Costly Isolation for the U.S.” (1999)
• “The Death Penalty in Black & White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides” (1998)
• “Innocence and the Death Penalty: The Increasing Danger of Executing the Innocent” (1997)