tissue graft may be a most predictable method in reconstructing
reconstruct the interdental papilla offers successful results [12].
The principle of dual blood supply of subepithelial connective
-
age of blood supply to the prevailing papilla by accessories to papil-
[14].
Successful results and improvement in interdental papilla with
reconstruction of interdental papilla was observed by Sawai., et al.
[15].
Semilunar incision allows coronal displacement without cre-
ating tension and prevents gingiva from rebounding back to its
tive tissue from the root surface to permit coronal displacement of
the gingivopapillary unit keeping the prevailing papilla completely
preserved. To eliminate the dead space and to maintain the gingival
-
thelial connective tissue graft. The graft was harvested just before
the surgical detachment of the papilla to prevent the development
of blood clot between the bone and connective tissue because
blood clot might compromise the immediate blood supply to the
graft and therefore can induce partial necrosis of the transplanted
tissue as suggested by Carnio J [16].
The graft in the present case report was harvested from palate
-
[17].
Flow of plasma and ingrowth of capillaries from surrounding
tissue into the subepithelial connective tissue graft leads to aes-
-
Reconstruction of the lost interdental papilla is the most chal-
lenging and least predictable problem because of narrow inter-
proximal space results obliteration, ischemia and ultimately to
necrosis of graft.
Conclusion
The major aesthetic challenge in periodontal plastic surgery is
ity of any surgical procedure for treating papilla loss depends on
connective tissue graft and the maintenance of good oral hygiene
-
terproximal papilla, subepithelial connective tissue graft proved to
-
nective tissue graft. The atraumatic management of the tissues, re-
spect for the blood supply and avoidance of tension and pressure
are critical for the viability of the tissues and the success for the
procedure.
Bibliography
1. et al. “Reconstruction of the Lost Interproximal Pa-
pilla Presentation of Surgical and Nonsurgical Approaches”.
International Symposium on Periodontics and Restorative Den-
tistry 19 (1999): 395-406.
2. Beagle JR. “Surgical Reconstruction of the Interdental Papilla”.
Case Report International Symposium on Periodontics and Re-
storative Dentistry 12 (1992): 145-151.
3. Miller PD and Allen EP. “The Development of Periodontal Plas-
tic Surgery”. Periodontology 11 (2000): 7-17.
4. R Mutha., et al. “Papillary reconstruction: A case report”.
Journal of Advanced Periodontology and Implant Dentistry 1
(2015): 33-34.
5. Jaiswal P., et al. “Surgical reconstruction of interdental papilla
using subethelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) with a coro-
The
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 11 (2010): 1-11.
6. Academy Report Informational Paper. “Oral Reconstructive
and Corrective Considerations in Periodontal Therapy”. Jour-
nal of Periodontology 76 (2005): 1588-1600.
7. Tarnow DP., et al. “The Effect of the Distance from the Contact
Point to the Crest of Bone on the Presence or absence Of the
Interproximal Papilla”. Journal of Periodontology 63 (1992):
995-996.
8. McGuire MK. “Periodontal Plastic Surgery”. Dental Clinics of
North America 42 (1998): 411-415.
9. Saleem M., et al.-
ability of isolated recession coverage – A 3-year follow-up case
report”. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Re-
search 7 (2021): 112-114.
11
Management of Lost Interdental Papilla by a Surgical Approach - A Case Report
Citation:
Mehvish Saleem., et al. “Management of Lost Interdental Papilla by a Surgical Approach - A Case Report". Acta Scientific Otolaryngology 3.12 (2021): 08-12.